BLOG STATUS: Updated 18 May 2018. See journal page for details.
Last article published: 19 Apr 2018, "Ishvara Gita - Sri Vaishnava Commentary - Chapter 1 - Questions of the Rishis ": Read here

Subscribe to updates here.

Prelude to Ishvara Gita - Part II: A Summary of Atharvashira Upanishad

In a previous journal post, we published a short article on the Jnana Yoga and stated that it forms an important prelude to an upcoming article on the Ishvara Gita. This post serves to provide another important prelude to the article, involving a summary of Atharvashira Upanishad. This is because the upAsana detailed in this Upanishad is related to the AtmopAsana detailed in the Ishvara Gita.
Shri Uttamur Swami has summarized the Atharvasiras in one page in his tamil work Upanishad Saram. This post is essentially a verbatim translation of the same. Its Tamil original can be read online in this link. This Swami has also authored a stotra called Vedanta Pushpanjali. It envisages each Upanishad as a flower and is offered to the feet of Shri Venkateswara. The section dedicated to the Atharvasiras and a few lines of explanation in Tamil can be read online in this link. We will also translate these into English in this post.
The Devas approached Rudra in the Svarga-loka and asked him who he was. Rudra answered thus: ‘I alone was there in the beginning, am there at present, and will be in future. There is nothing else apart from me’. The Devas were perplexed as Rudra spoke the words that must be spoken by bhagavAn. They doubted whether Rudra considers himself as the Supreme, or whether he considers the Supreme Lord Narayana as his antaryAmin. Rudra then explained his first reply thus: ‘Devas! The paramAtman that you have in mind has entered what is subtler than the subtlest. He has entered all directions. Hence, I am indeed He (i.e., He is my antaryAmin). Thus, I am the all that is eternal, all that is perceivable and imperceptible, and so on (i.e., the antaryAmin of everything is my antaryAmin).’  Rudra answered in this manner due to the nature of his meditation on bhagavAn as his own antaryAmin and as the antaryAmin of everything. Indeed, Vamadeva and Prahlada also have stated thus (in the shruti and smR^iti, respectively). By this, Rudra announces himself as an adhikAri who performs bhagavad bhakti.
In the second kANDa, the Devas praise and worship bhagavAn as their respective antaryAmin, in the manner that Rudra stated earlier. In the third, the praNava that signifies bhagavAn was named variously. In the fourth, those names were explained. In the fifth, the upAsana of bhagavAn as Rudra’s antaryAmin was introduced and specified as a way of bhakti. In it, wearing of the bhasma with mantras was also specified as a vow. Finally, the greatness of bhagavAn and the result of this upAsana were explained.
As stated in the upaniShad, the upAsaka who meditates on bhagavAn as the antaryAmin  of Rudra has to perform bhasma-dhAraNa as part of it. The bhakti-yogi can do this, just as he can meditate on bhagavAn as the antaryAmin of Indra, Brahma, and Surya. Those who are unclear of this will tend to think that the upaniShad says it is appropriate to worship Rudra as the Supreme in the manner of the pAshupata Agamas. If that was the case, there would be no reason for the Devas to first ask Rudra who he was. The only reason was that Rudra’s appearance and actions were different from typical Vishnu bhaktas (in terms of smearing his body with ashes, etc). Rudra’s reply was ‘My antaryAmin is the same as your antaryAmin. Hence, my deeds and attire is also a kind of upAsana’. Having learned this, the Devas praised Rudra as a Vaishnava. Our Purvacharyas have discussed this upaniShad in vedArtha saMgraha, tattvasAra, shrutaprakAshikA, and other works.
Those who read through this Upanishad superficially will think of Rudra as the Supreme. One should however note the words of Rudra ‘He has entered all. Hence, I am indeed Him and I alone am everything.’ He does not say ‘I have entered everything’, but ‘He has entered everything’. Note the third-person usage. Also, note other evidences such as the usage of the term bhagavAn that primarily denotes Vasudeva as per the Vishnu Purana.
In the ashvamedhika parva, where bhAgavata-dharma is explained, Sri Krishna says that even those who worship Him with atharvashiras are bhAgavatas:
atharvazirasA caiva nityam AtharvaNA dvijAH
stuvanti satataM ye mAM te 'pi bhAgavatAH smRtAH
(Mahabharata, Ashvamedhika Parva, BORI 14_004_3378 - 14_004_3379)

Meaning: (You must) know that those AtharvaNa brAhmaNas who chant the atharvashiras daily as part of their worship of Me (KrishNa) are also bhAgavatas, my devotees.
The shruti itself (Nrsimha Purva Tapini) says that the nR^isiMha mantra is the essence of Sri Rudram, Atharvashikha, and atharvashiras.
    sarvAtmyaM rudradR^iShTaM tadanubhavabalAt tasya devaiH stuti~nca
tvadvAcyo~NkAranAmAnyabhihitavivR^itiM bhasmasaMsparshayuktam |
IshAnAntarniyantuH shritarama | tava nidhyAnamitthamvidhatva-
nmAhAtmya~ncApyadhIteH phalamiha ca shiraH saptabhiH prAha khaNDaiH ||
rudro bhasmAvR^itA~Ngo visadR^iganimiShairvismitaiH ko bhavAni-
tyuktaH svaM sAdhuvR^ittaM gamayitumagadat nityasarvAtmatAM svAm |
sa svasmAdantaraM tvAmapi bahirakhilAd vIkShya lakShmIsha ! so.ahaM
sarvo.apyanyonyabhinno.ahamiti dR^iDhamatistaishca vedyaM svamAha ||
tvadrUpastattvadR^iShTyA shritarama | vibudhairvindito.asau tatastvAM
tasyAtmAnaM vidan san bhasitavilasitaH shAntimatyantameti |
tArastvaddhyAnamantraH, vidadhati vidhiviShNvIshalokAptimeta
nmAtrAH turyAdhamAtrA punariha tanute.anAmayatvapadAptim ||
Meaning: The Atharvashiras consists of seven kANDas detailing the following topics:
  • The sarvAntarAtma stage of meditation experienced by Rudra,
  • The praise of the Devas, after knowing that (Rudra attained that stage),
  • The names and meanings of the syllable ‘om’, which relates to Bhagavan Sriman Narayana, and
  • The dhyAna on Rudra’s antaryAmin performed with the wearing of ashes.
Thus the upaniShad explains Vishnu’s greatness.
The Devas enquired Rudra as to who he was, in other words whether he was a Vishnu bhakta or not. This is because Rudra wears ashes in contrast to others. To announce himself as a Vishnu bhakta, Rudra answered their question from the point of view of the antaryAmin, thus: “Since bhagavAn (Sriman Narayana) is the antaryAmin to myself and everything, I can say that I am everything.” Knowing thus, the devas praised him. The upAsaka who meditates on bhagavAn as Rudra’s antaryAmin must wear ashes. The mantra is praNava (the syllable ‘om’). By it, one can attain Para Vasudeva’s eternal blemishless nitya vibhUti.


  1. In this context, we would lile to point out that the infamous "Shiva Gita" of Padma Purana has a chapter which attempts to explain away the atharvasiras as a praise of shiva. It is proof that this section is interpolated, since its' character differs from even regular sections of tAmasa purANAs. Not to mention that the philosophy contained in it also is a mess, merely a hodge-podge of several genuine statements + some invented ones. Take the following example:

    //I (grasp) without hands and (walk without) feet; I am that inestimable power; I see without eyes; I hear without ears. I am every manifest form and there is no one who knows Me. I am ever the consciousness. ||54||

    I am alone the One who revealed by all the Vedas. I am the author of Vedanta, and I am alone the knower of the Vedas.//

    This is taken from the Kaivalya Upanishad and directly incorporated into the Shiva Gita, as spoken by Shiva apparently. The interpolator did not realize that these mantras in the Kaivalyopanishad actually describe the Jivatma and not Paramatma, and thus used them as part of a discourse apparently given by Shiva to call himself the supreme! These are characteristics of the Jivatma only, which we will see later.

    The last few chapters of the patala khanda of padma purANa are interpolations. Ignorant interpolators make a lot of such mistakes which give them away. You can see similar basic errors in the interpolated sections of drona and anushAsana parvas in the mahAbhAratA as well. They are a disgrace to the sacred name of Shri Veda Vyasa.

  2. Nice Article
    Myself Karthik brought up in a Brahmin family which extolls shaivism
    But am a vaishnava by choice.I have read the Bhagavata Purana and Shiva Purana to some extent
    I have felt that Bhagavata Purana makes more sense while explaining the Narayana Paratattva. The Shiva Purana (which is a tamasik purana) resorts to tamasik ways in explaining Shiva Paratattva,like how Shiva beats Narasimha in war and so on.This is a tamasik way of explaining a Paratattva concept.In Bhagavatha Purana it says everything originated from Vasudeva and everything shall finally merge with Vasudeva. This is a sattvik way of explaining Paratattvam
    That's why our purvacharyas never resorted to tamasik Purana while explaining parabrahman
    Vaishnaviam is pure sattvik tattvam and only vaishnaviam is the path that can take the Jivatma to the abode of Sriman Narayana


Please click here and read the information in red carefully before posting comments

Kindly also check if we already have an answer to your question, in the FAQ section of this blog: